Smoke on the Water: The Truth About Clinton and Guns

August 20, 2006

The Truth About Clinton and Guns

Found this morning, via Instapundit.

This article from Judicial Watch, which provides excerpts from, and direct links to whole PDF documents eminating from the Clinton White House addressing their efforts to disarm America.

(Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch, the public interest group that fights government corruption, announced today that it has uncovered new documents from the Clinton Presidential Library in Little Rock, Arkansas which shed light on the Clintons’ plan to attack the gun industry. The following are highlights from the documents:

One excerpt from that article, which clearly tags the left's entire approach to victory through the courts and liberal tort attorneys. What they could never win in a public vote, they seek to carry through the courts, usurping your will, and mine.

The "promising idea" identified by Blumenthal involved filing massive product liability and negligence lawsuits against major handgun makers, "the opening salvo in a campaign against the gun industry by an alliance of anti-tobacco attorneys and local governments," wrote The Los Angeles Times. According to one of the lawyers involved in the lawsuits: "We are going to do to [the gun industry] what we did to tobacco. It's going to be a very large war."

I've read all twenty PDF pages in the aforementioned link. And it's truly sickening to see the obvious relish with which the Clinton White House attacked the rights of you, me and our fellow citizens.

I wish I had the free-time to write a solid takedown of each and every document, but alas, I don't. But I will post this as rapidly as possible, and invite others in the gunblogging world to get after it, and publicize these Clintonian transgressions as widely and loudly as possible.

We must not let the Hildebeest bring such evil intent back to the helm of the Oval Office! Now, the Hildebeest has been "playing to the center" as were, in regards to one of the Holy Grails of the democrat party; Gun Control. Yet she, and every other presidential contender from the left has a deep-seated elitist streak in them. And disarming America is at the core of their cause.

It always has, and it always shall be.

If you've ever given a moment's credence to the Hildebeest and her kabuki theater of "centrism", keep this in mind the next time the MSN gushes forth with their next gallon of leftist kool-aid. And then do everything you can, with all your might to keep her wretched hands as far from the reins of power as is humanly possible.

This of course applies to the entire democrat party, but especially to the Hildebeest. She's not just the most dangerous woman in America, she is indeed the most dangerous person on the left, and she must not ever weild presidential power.

Not if you cherish your rights as an American.

Posted by Jim on August 20, 2006 | Permalink

Comments

Actually, Cap'n, the Hildebeest frontal attack is preferable to the death of a thousand cuts that we've been suffering these last 30 or 40 years.

With the frontal attack, the wrongness of the Left's plan vis-a-vis the Second Amendment is plain to see, and it's much easier to get more ordinary folk involved in the defense of the Second, maybe even to the point of strengthening it.

With the death of a thousand cuts, each cut is not of earthshaking significance, so the general public ignores these little trespasses against the Second.

An added advantage of the frontal attack is that the entire MSM would support it, and the public would get to see what enemies of the state the Fourth Estate has become, the better to put them back in their place.

Nope, I'm not wishing for a Shrillary victory, but I can handle her frontal attack.

Bring it on.

Posted by: Rivrdog | August 20, 2006 at 04:58 PM

I should also note that I'd much prefer death by water torture to a "full frontal attack" from Hillary.

*claws at eyes*

Posted by: Caimlas | August 20, 2006 at 06:40 PM

Damn. I'd made a fairly long comment prior to my above post, but it appears I was overzealous and it did not get posted for whatever reason.

Short of it was: if Hillary does come to power, she will bring with her all the communist/socialist vices that are so aborrent to our American Constitution. If that's the case, I hope she reaps the whirlwind. If she does not, we will know for certain whether the American Experiment has finally failed, and won't have to continue rotting slowly.

Posted by: Caimlas | August 20, 2006 at 06:43 PM

Thanks for the information...
I will not part with my guns.
No way. No how.
Have a wonderful day!
*^_^
(=':'=) hugs
(")_ (")Š from da Raggedy one

Posted by: Raggedy | August 21, 2006 at 02:06 AM

I know I'm going to be sorry I got into this but I just have to say that I was a Democrat for many years and compared to you, I'd be called a liberal, although I think of myself as a moderate. But I've supported private gun rights all my life and I would rather see us nuked than see Hillary president of this country. And I wasn't fond of Slick Willie either.

The reason I bother to say any of this is that it worries me when I see the fight defined as between liberals and conservatives or Democrats against Republicans. That's not what it is anymore.

I just wish we could spend more time finding our common ground because the real fight is between the professional politicians and us -- the people. I don't care what party they're in, unless you're in the top 1% of the income holders, they're all screwing the rest of us. I think the answer is to dump the incumbents. Every bleeding one of them. And make sure we elect people who understand they're accountable to us.

Posted by: Libby | August 23, 2006 at 05:51 PM